Yonah Continued
In many ways, Sukkot
represents the culmination of the teshuva process, but in a more primal way. In
a certain respect, after a person comes to terms with the fact that he is loved
just for the way he is, for his very and every effort, like the people of Ninveh,
he is summoned to leave behind the newfound comfort, the stable ground
attained, and step outside. Perhaps like Avraham stepping beyond himself to see
the stars above, to realize that his destiny is infinite if he expands his comfort
zone, so too – nestled in our protective lanugo – we are immediately wrested
from the comfort and forced outside into a milieu not of our choosing, and not
necessarily to our liking.
In effect, that is the message
we learn in Sukkot. That life can rattle us, bring upon us great joys and great
pain, but that we're still enveloped in a protective, albeit seemingly frail
shelter. The famed question about what the sukkah is reminiscent of is answered
in one of two ways, one, the huts our ancestors knew in the desert, and
secondly, the clouds that protected us above. It would seem that the two coincide
on a philosophical plane. To feel comfort, one needs basic protection, but the
greater sense of feeling inoculated from life's treacherous pitfalls, and
seemingly inimitable and denervating challenges is the deep-seeded faith that
one is protected by the One above. Perhaps Maslow would talk about a hierarchy,
a graduated way to attain greater personal fruition, but Judaism doesn't see it
that way. Life itself lacks meaning without either material or spiritual
substance, and furthermore, the two are synchronous and need to be achieved simultaneously.
Perhaps that was the message
implicit in Moshe speaking to the rock at Mei Meriva, the drastic turn
of fate that would keep him from entering the land. The person, in contrast to
animals, is referred to in Jewish thought as the medaber. Animals have physical
prowess that often outmatches our own. Hitting the rock that was to bring water
and satiate our thirst, would have been animalistic in nature and by design.
Hashem, it would seem, was asking Moshe to serve as a paradigm for how to address
Him at times of sorrow and difficulty in the promised land. With the indispensability
of working the land – and relying on their own bodily efforts – the Jews would
need to couple it with prayer, looking heavenward for support. The desert was
an oasis of sorts; man didn't need to beckon God but rather the opposite was
true. In the new land, a land "whose rocks are iron (Devarim 8:9) Jews
would need to have the mettle to fend with the natural forces, the rocks, the
soil, the rain patterns etc. but more importantly, they needed to step out of
the embryonic existence of dependency, and realized that with heavenly support from
above, they could conquer their enemies and till the land below.
In a sense, without a reliance on ourselves, and acceptance of ourselves,
something that the Book of Yonah teaches us, we wouldn't have the gumption to
face the elements, the most elemental being the fusion of human drive and will
with Hashem's providence from above.
Comments
Post a Comment