Where the Spies Went Wrong
To be perfectly honest, I always thought that the "sin of the spies" was clear cut, and required little further research or investigation.
The spies had badmouthed the land, when they were supposed to come back
with an uplifting, dramatic report of imminent victory, coupled with the land's
greatness.
It seems though – as the Ramban writes himself – that the matter is not
as pat and clear as would meet the eye. Having been commanded to appraise the
land, the 10 naysayers did just that; they sized up the situation, weighing the
costs and benefits, and advised Moshe and Aharon and Sanhedrin to reconsider
their impending attack.
Why then, the Ramban asks were they punished so severely. The Ramban's
answer is lengthy, with many stages and presumptions that seem difficult to
accept according to the simple meaning of the text. For example, the Ramban
writes that the spies were commanded to respond as to whether the land was good
– and bring back fruit – so as to show off the splendor of the land! At the same
time, one being sent to scope out the land would have felt that he was
dutifully doing his job were he to say that the size of the fruit were
indicative, and reflective, of the physical stature, and size of the people dwelling
there.
I myself have heard many answers given; they were commanded latur –
or see the positive attributes of the land, whereas they saw themselves as
spies, meraglim from the language of le'ragel. The spies
themselves attest, though to the fact that they had done the former, and our weekly
reading says the same. Others posit they were afraid for their own political
stature, whereas others still say they were afraid of the lower spiritual level
in the land.
It seems to me that where they went wrong was by trying to circumvent
the formal chain of command; almost, like a coup d'état. Having failed to persuade
the Sanhedrin, the elders, they went to the commonfolk, to try to spark an
uprising, casting aspersion on the very heart of Jewish leadership; in this case,
it happened to be those who were hand-picked by God.
Perhaps another reading is that they failed to realize the primacy and
indispensability of the Land of Israel, painting it as volitional, something
the people could do without, which piqued God's ire. I think both of these are
true, but for certain, any desire to kowtow to the masses is one that seems to
be bound for failure, one Hashem wanted to imprint in the fabric of our people,
our very national DNA.
Comments
Post a Comment